But what about smaller, subtle, more persistent forms of racism? Continue watching. Sep Gwen Ifill…. Apr Being gay is extremely taboo in deeply religious Uganda, where one tabloid urged the hanging of people it called the country's "top homos. Mar Feb Support Provided By: Learn more. Wednesday, Nov Go ad-free!
Support AllSides. Learn more ». Join Now Already on AllSides? Share this rating:. Our records indicate that this outlet does not have a paywall. If this is incorrect, please email us to let us know. We watched the episode and read the transcript to see how that interview unfolded.
Anthony Fauci joins me now. And is that relevant? The two questions and the introduction establish that Trump was part of the discussion, if not the main topic. Woodruff's next question was about the judgment of "the White House" to host the event honoring Barrett. Fauci, was it wise for the White House to host this — over people in the Rose Garden, but also indoors, the event for Judge Barrett, with — where you had very few people wearing masks, no social distancing, in retrospect?
Fauci did not answer the question directly but listed preventive measures that people should take. People perceive different things from a single uttered statement, depending on how they interpret non-verbal cues and context. But in journalism, reporters and anchors are used to getting political answers from subjects who are trying to stay out of hot water.
The elephant in the room — in this case, the White House and its Rose Garden — was the lack of mask wearing and social distancing at the Barrett reception. Photos and film from the soiree were all over the internet, including Twitter, with observations that participants were doling out air kisses and hugs with nary a care.
Both interviewer and interviewee were familiar with the controversy. The interviewer had to close the loop that the interviewee left open. Woodruff would not have asked the question, was it wise to hold such an event, out of the blue. I have always enjoyed and appreciated the NewsHour and will continue to watch. After receiving several complaints from viewers about biased PBS material circulating on social media, we set out to see who or what was behind PBS.
So were we. We called CSC and were referred to Twitter, whom we then began pelting with requests for comment, via …. I'm not sure how your initial email was lost. Looking into this for you. After s everal weeks passed we sent another email to Ms. Kelley to follow up — this time to her direct email address at Twitter — but she did not reply. How the web address became a fake-news bazaar remains a mystery. If you put PBS. He found suspicious sites with no single owner.
Still, PBS. One of our earnest tech wizards then discovered a possible, more innocuous origin story for PBS. The PBS part of the suspicious address is actually a clumsy acronym. The Blobstore was set up to isolate not just "bad" files, but all image files that accompany tweets.
Our IT specialist found this during his deep dive into the subject:. The front-end understands where a given photo needs to be written, and forwards it on to the servers responsible for actually storing the data. These storage servers, which we call storage nodes, write the photo to a disk and then inform a Metadata store that the image has been written and instruct it to record the information required to retrieve the photo The Metadata store Data researcher Jorge Melchor added that Twitter tries to isolate potentially harmful material that comes onto the platform:.
0コメント